🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also designing protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also sends a powerful message that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."